Best philosophy textbooks reddit. I like Sider and Feldman's Riddles of Existence a lot.


Best philosophy textbooks reddit Furthermore Feng was extremely well educated on western philosophy so he outlined his book using western philosophical framework. It had a ton of very specific examples Kahneman researched. It’s best we treat people fairly. Doing that would have saved me around $15. We are not a subreddit to ask psychiatrists questions either about individual situations about psychiatry generally. Reginald Allen (GP) . But his books are basically no more than a collection of personal anecdotes designed to help sell his unimaginative philosophy. There is also a survey book on phil logic by Cohnitz and Estrada-Gonzalez, called An Introduction to Philosophy of Logic. Available online. , linguists, mathematics, However, it merely teaches you what formal logic looks like, how to use it, and doesn't actually teach how it is used in philosophy. I’m not “flexing on you spiritually” or anything - you can do whatever you want but just don’t justify it with “having your pay your way” through a college with insanely cheap tuition and plenty of continuing student scholarship opportunities. Mind: Chalmers - Philosophy of Mind, Science: Lange - Philosophy of Science an Anthology. ———- Congratulations, you’re an analytic philosophers now (even though you’ve never read Wittgenstein’s Tractatus). Philosophical Investigations by Ludwig Wittgenstein. Since the West is very dogmatic and basically treats philosophy as something that needs to directly follow a kind of specific chain from the past, it quite simply doesn't have much room to allow for interaction in any easy way with Philosophy from a totally different place that exists in a state that is totally different than it is. As u/cornandbeanz said Russell's A History of Western Philosophy might be a good place to start if you keep in mind that it is a somewhat polemical and oftentimes misleadingly superficial and biased work. It’s more chemically oriented than the layman’s disappearing spoon, but also focuses on how the discovery of and understanding of the featured molecules changed the world as we know it. As of July 1 2023, r/askphilosophy only allows answers from panelists, whether those answers are posted as top-level comments or replies to other comments. (And please don't give me the "Agile just doesn't get implemented correctly, so therefore your experience is ackshually not Agile, technically speaking. They're usually published under the title "College Physics", and are often geared towards students in the health fields (premed, nursing, physical therapy, etc. I'm not sure if it's relevant what my intentions are, but I'll explain them for the sake of clarity, as I know that there are many types of logic, and probably many systems for teaching it depending on the goals of the reader, e. A new college semester is starting soon, and a slew of very expensive books is required. There are a lot of other books that are worth reading as well, depending on what you're Sure, the two most popular resources on these topics are Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design (a junior year textbook in the typical ME program) and Machinerys Handbook (not an academic reference, but more a catch-all reference for many concepts, lookup tables, and useful working information on the job). It's just cheap stuff, often crossing the border to oriental new-age trash. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only Here are the textbook/book names: Greek Philosophy: Thales to Aristotle, 3rd edition, ed. I am wanting to purchase a propositional logic textbook (though I'm never opposed to quality, questionably legal pdf versions). These guys are highly entertaining and I think I've listened to every one of their episodes a few times (I did a lot of driving the past year) and they make philosophy incredibly accessible without dumbing it down. I’ve paid my way through college/am completely financially independent from my parents. I've recently studied basic logic including propositional and first order (predicate) logic at undergraduate level, but there The best way would be to take philosophy classes taught by philosophy professors with syllabi, required reading lists, classroom discussions, written assignments, etc. I also have a fondness for Chisholm's three One problem is that the term 'free will' variably means the ability to do otherwise or the control necessary for moral responsibility, and even worse, that some people confuse this claim for the claim that those who think that free will is the ability to do otherwise rather than sourcehood simply hold the semantic claim that 'free will' simply means the ability to do otherwise. g. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason You don't have to read the book if you're solely interested in Sartre, but I think you should be familiar with the argument especially the difference between phenomena and noumena and Kant's argument in the Transcendental Aesthetic. I liked The Logic Book the best, but it was super expensive. I have recently procured an interest in the philosophy of Fredrich Nietzsche. Peter Godfrey-Smith's Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Of course there are other textbooks but those would be too advanced. Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl. I'm wanting something that is reasonably deep and formal so a textbook might be best, but I am also essentially a neophyte (although I do know a Welcome to r/askphilosophy. The Essential Augustine, 2nd edition, ed. a 2nd edition physics book Bertrand Russell's "The Problems of Philosophy" as Laughing_Chipmunk suggested is short and a great introduction to the basic problems in philosophy. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only Some people go to Sci-hub (for journal articles) and Library Genesis (for books). While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only Hi All, Hope you are doing okay with the Coronavirus pandemic and are surviving quarantine. I am a big reader and am wondering if you have any recommendations for must-read psychology books that are really interesting, could be theories, experiments, etc. It's dense of course, but an incredible overview of a huge array of philosophical thought. So I've sort of been using the r/askphilosophy FAQ to get into philosophy—in particular, the introductory textbooks. Get app If you are not already familiar with the cannon of sociology ( and some argue to dismantle it ) then why ask Reddit for the ‘best books in sociology’ ? The Hamkins book Lectures on the Philosophy of Mathematics is probably the best place to start for a math student. Here are some recommendations from Christine Korsgaard, who was asked to recommend five books in a recent interview: . How to Teach Philosophy to Your Dog by Anthony McGowan is a brilliant introduction to Western philosophy, presented as a conversation between the author and his pooch, Monty. Especially in areas like advanced mathematics where texts take different approaches and a persons preferences become dependent on their personal background or interests within the subject. I re-sold about 70% of my textbooks from college after I finished the classes I needed them for, and most of the ones I kept wouldn't have re-sold for much more than the shipping costs. Recent editions are expensive, but you can get an old edition from abebooks or similar for reasonably cheap. I want to expand my perspective of things that is why I'm inspired to learn philosophy. Other texts in this area are somewhat reversed and will tend to be written for those more versed in general matters of philosophy. The Story of Philosophy by Will Durant. Publisher description: Philosophy begins with Routledge: Metaphysics, Epistemology, Ethics, Philosophy of Language, Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Mind, Classic Philosophy John Searle: Any book. Look how you've tried and tried to sell them already, with no takers. If you want a good introductory survey, go with Reale's History of Ancient Philosophy (4 vols. Welcome to r/askphilosophy! Please read our updated rules and guidelines before commenting. On Denoting by Russell is often pointed to as the founding essay of the method of analytic philosophy. Aquí nos gustaría mostrarte una descripción, pero el sitio web que estás mirando no lo permite. Following up with the much longer "History of Western Philosophy" would also be advisable. The Reddit LSAT Forum. It would be great if you can suggest me a book in cosmology that you thought was the best. are both textbooks giving a broad overview of their respective fields. If you wish to learn more, or to apply to become a panelist, Probably the best is a history of philosophy textbook. This is the best place on Reddit to post philosophy memes! If you're looking for more formal philosophy discussion please check out r/philosophy. Cress (DM) Jean-Paul Sartre, . I would like to ask for recommendations for philosophy textbooks that can work as introductory material. Never have and never will use one of these sites. We seek to encourage the sharing of interesting studies, experiments, videos and articles that will interest students of all ages and promote science and Welcome to r/askphilosophy! Please read our updated rules and guidelines before commenting. Razavi’s book is most people’s first book When I began writing introductory philosophy books in the late 1980s, the only introductions that were readily available were The Problems of Philosophy by Bertrand Russell, which was published in 1912, and a book called Philosophy Made Simple – which was actually a good book, but people found the title off-putting because it sounded like it was dumbing the subject down. A general rule of thumb is that if a textbook has upwards of 10 editions, and isn't in a field that would necessarily necessitate frequent updates (the basics of classical mechanics and E/M aren't changing, so this voids Halliday and Resnick), as the quality typically deteriorates and the publishers are likely cunts, changing nothing more than Because it’s really good lol. Despite knowing a bit of philosophy there’s still a ton out there so any suggestions for accessible reads are welcome! This a place for psychology students to discuss study methods, get homework help, get job search advice, and what ever else comes to mind. I have studied a lot of political philosophy, both Welcome to r/askphilosophy. TAoCP is great for what it is, but more as a reference. The thing with renting textbooks is that it is often better to outright buy the book used then sell it back to the school bookstore or Amazon. But, it is very effective at teaching what a first order logical language looks like. Recycling them is the most valuable use for them. I'm wondering if there are any good textbooks (or maybe just any type of book) to understand cognitive science. /r/ScienceTeachers is a place for science educators to collaborate on and contribute tips, ideas, labs, and curricula. Stephen Stich, John Doris, and Erica Roedder's Altruism. I also checked The Oxford Companion to Philosophy , which seems Here are the 35 best philosophy books of all time! 1. Austin . So can you provide me some names of good books on Logic, both from philosophical and mathematical perspective? My interests are mainly in Axiomatic Set theory, Epistemic Logic, Fuzzy logic, Many-valued Logic, Second-order language and Mathematical Philosophy, to name some. Robert Shaver's Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Egoism. I have a background in Statistics (masters degree) but I never had the chance to take a causal inference class. c-PTSD: From Surviving to Thriving by Pete Walker Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents by Lindsay Gibson (grain of Oh, sure. If you want to read an actual philosopher's work, I'd suggest starting with Hume. I'd probably put them on my list of books that every computer scientist (who's interested in the set of Welcome to r/askphilosophy. Thanks :) 12 votes, 12 comments. Finally, if you want to look more generally at formal methods in philosophy you may want to look at Steinhart More precisely. Primary sources (actual works of philosophy- I wouldn't think of them as "sources" in most contexts) are the thing. Descartes, Meditations on the First Philosophy. As promised, a variation of the masterpiece "Title" by But truly, the BEST textbook, in my world, or we could say the best informative reference book that I learned the most from and appreciate the information that I utilize in my actual life is: Well shit theres two cause I can't decide 1) Let the Water do the Work: Induced Meandering, an Evolving Method for Restoring Incised Channels by Bill Zeedyk and Van Clothier or 2) I’ve paid my way through college/am completely financially independent from my parents. Gray & Meyer’s book is good for low frequency design and up to date versions of Baker’s book is good as it also mentions short channel alternatives for on hand circuits. The other two seem good, but I can't really comment on them. I'm making an essay to send to various top players in my city in a plea to why philosophy should be included in the This was also the first philosophy book I read, other than a half-hearted attempt at the Republic. That's where I get mine. Think what you want to work on your day to day, the lifestyle you want to lead and then decide your degree. You could do worse than starting with "The Apology of Socrates. Russell is interesting, but I think he might be challenging for a first philosophy book; he pulls on knowledge of other philosophers. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Don't simply assume that all logic is formal in nature, or that it is the best kind of logical theory. This book can help you narrow down the branches of philosophy you will find most interesting. reddit's new API changes kill third party apps that offer accessibility features, mod tools, and other features not found in the first party app. The other three I mostly know through reputation. ") This is the best place on Reddit to post philosophy memes! If you're looking for more formal philosophy discussion please check out r/philosophy. A book that last year I stared to get into philosophy, and I wanted to know books to star to get into philosophy, preferably I want to star with small book's I've been tempted to buy Will Durant's The Story of Philosophy, but am not sure if it is the best book to get started on philosophy (plus, the book has some mixed reviews). It’s written by an organic chemist and includes structural information. couldnt find a rule against posting this The short version is that it lays out some very important facts for understanding metaphysics and physics that are most often ignored by both laypeople and philosophers alike. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only Most quantum textbooks focus on examples and details that they think are likely relevant for future physicists but that end up obscuring the essence of quantum mechanics. Non-panelists can participate in subsequent discussion, but are not allowed to answer OP's question(s). 140 votes, 81 comments. 2008. On the side of a vastly I would like to ask for recommendations for philosophy textbooks that can work as introductory material. If you look at a lot of graphs consider colourful e-reader. com last year for a $200 physics textbook that I rented for about $90. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind looks good (I had a good experience with the series and it looks like they included a bunch of top philosophers). It’s very in depth but well written to the point that you don’t need an extensive background to understand it. If you wish to learn more, or to apply to become a panelist, In the same vein, if one is interested in learning a bit about philosophy, we might recommend some textbooks on the branches of philosophy, like epistemology [1], logic [2], moral philosophy [3], philosophy of science [4], metaphysics [5] and so on, whatever is of interest to you. " Generally regarded as the most accurate depiction of Socrates in Plato's works- the traditional wisdom is that later Socrates is more of a mouth-piece for Platonic views but that in this early work we probably get a relaticely accurate view of Socrates himself, as he faces death for "corrupting the youth. In part since both philosophers and laypeople both have an intuitive idea of how physics works that is about a hundred years out of date, and doesn't actually tap into the nuances of the developments of I am a mathematics major who has taken various philosophy classes. 2. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only Welcome to r/askphilosophy. , so it’s not all recent). e. It's written for first-year philosophy students taking their first course in logic. I'm looking for a good textbook for digital communications. The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) is the test required to get into an ABA law school. Its is amazing device it is pleasures to read and write with it. I really like Vihvelin's book Causes, Laws, and Free Will. I used Chegg. I recently watched a video of where to start reading Nietzsche and it said to go find the best philosophy department in universities of your language, check their first curriculum and use their textbooks to receive a good secondary source of the Philosophers ideas before diving into reading the philosopher himself. The Blackburn book clearly and concisely goes through most of the large Does anyone have any recommendations for good philosophy textbooks? I was thinking sort of introductory books that have sections devoted to all the main areas of philosophy. My impression is that philosophy is usually taught from primary sources (Philosopher X's own writing) or sometimes via secondary sources (Philosopher Y's analysis on Philosopher X). I know my career is geared towards counseling, but it's been a while that I read about introduction to just sociology in general. 4K subscribers in the textbooks community. Another common textbook is by Cutnell & Johnson. So I started reading Loux's Metaphysics, which I haven't fully completed yet, and now I've been reading Alyssa Ney's Metaphysics (which is very good at first glance). PM me if interested, will be donating at the end of the month. Skip to main content. That said, I wish I had gone from Will to History of Philosophy and then PEL. Bourke (EA) . ) for #1-3 and Gerson's (ed. Hi all, I will be taking a cosmology course this semester and I want to start reading an elementary level but fun to read book in cosmology. I want a textbook that is rigorous and which is good when it comes to provision of definitions, and I want it to help me with studying individual works of philosophy independently. His interest has sparked my interest, but rather than pay to take a course at a university, I was wondering if anyone has any recommendations for a beginner philosophy book/website/whatever. colour (or good grey scale). If you want to understand those points, you need to understand how language works. Apologies to the mods if this breaks the rules. Members Online. Solomon. What you want to read, depends on how comprehensive you want to dive into the history of philosophy. From what I've witnessed at least, it's definitely not something an aspiring philosopher or generally smart person without experience in philosophy can pick up without pretext or context and Non-expert opinion: I'm working through Peter Smith's (who also wrote the "Teach Yourself Logic" guide posted in this thread) Introduction to Formal Logic at the moment, and I really like it. I get the impression that, among philosophers, the Stoics command more interest than Neoplatonists. I am not sure if you are currently a student, but asking a professor who specializes in political philosophy in either the political science department or the philosophy department can be helpful. Pace the other commenter, I’d say Hegel will not be helpful at all for philosophy of mind, and Best books for an introduction to philosophy before branching off into other parts of philosophy? Right now I'm reading "The Big Questions" by Robert C. It probably won't help much with modern philosophy, but you could use the public domain to get some source works up to around 1925. If you want something more "vigorous" but perhaps not too hard, you can check out something by Ortega y Gasset; I particularly find interesting La deshumanización del arte. 2nd edition of Philip Allen’s book is good for designing op-amps in a traditional fashion (no gm/ID). Anyone who wants to understand Philosophy has to read Plato and Aristotle; it took other philosophers nearly 2000 years to add to their work. If not greayscale should be enough even for biology and anatomy Also I have a supernote. What everybody else said--your textbooks are worthless, monetarily. So I have decided to go for self studying in Logic. For a more multicultural, rather than western-focused, overview, I Two good places to start are Simon Blackburn's book Think and Julian Baggini's The Pig That Wants to be Eaten. The Daily Stoic by Ryan Holiday. Hit me with your best books. Ten years on and the BOB is the only one I regret selling--even though I desperately needed the money at the time. Depending on how in depth you want to go, you could use the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy for a survey of modern philosophy. D. It sounds silly, but it's actually very instructional! On the other hand, why start with books? I found the best way to get into philosophy was watching YouTube (Crash Course is brilliant), and listening to I have free Ancient Greek Philosophy and 19th Century Philosophy textbooks for anyone who needs one. Carol Macomber (EH) Edith Stein, selections from Essays If you want some decent, non-introductory books in philosophy of science, I would recommend: Hacking's Representing and Intervening. He wrote the book in English which is good because then you don't have to worry about potentially poor translations, which is often a problem when seeking to find material on chinese topics. You said another book was too "educational", which I guess means you aren't looking for textbooks, so this one may not work for you. Peter Geodfrey Smith: Any book. Welcome to r/askphilosophy. There is some recent research on Stoic logic and philosophy of language as well. One that's fun to read for its "for and against" approach to the various issues is Matthias Steup and Ernest Sosa's Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only I am looking to buy the following textbooks, lmk if you have them: Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Scepticism (Cambridge University Press), ISBN-10: 0521778093 Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), ISBN-10: 1107665736 Hume, An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (Oxford University Press), ISBN-10: 0198752482 Kant I think this has and will continue to be a huge problem for society. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only Math: Putnam & Benacerraf - Philosophy of Mathematics. Cognitive psych in general investigates phenomena like memory, language and decision making behaviourally, whereas cognitive neuroscience looks for the physiological correlates and causes of those behaviours (in general). New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Think about the whole Penrose consciousness debacle, and the damage that stuff cand do This Liberation Psychology textbook is **chefs kiss** All About Love by bell hooks, actually almost anything by bell hooks. I have to recommend a selection here. On the other hand, Plato's dialogues are very readable and give a good introduction to the discipline. I watch a carneades video on Abduction and depending on the definition of induction, abduction falls into that clump. I've never taken a class in philosophy of mind but a few things -- including this article by Eric Schwitzgebel on consciousness-- have inspired me to give it a more in depth look. The first two you should be able to find as full text PDFs online rather readily. Anthony Kenny's A New History of Western Philosophy is a great overview of western philosophy distilled into one volume. It's great because it contains pairs of essays on core topics, each of which was written for the purpose of the volume. The Hello everyone! I've been interested in Philosophy lately and wanted to learn more. O'Connor's The Evolution of Unfairness. . Also, I know this is a book sub, but the History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps is an excellent podcast that starts at the very beginning. Even textbooks and historical accounts are still written by a human, and thus, not truly objective. Great thinkers appropriate or coin terms for use in metaphysical description, then use trickles out to other academics, intellectuals, writers, and the general population where users only ever comprehend a portion of the full contingent meaning of the words. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only More on introductory texts, this amazon review of Professor Jaegwon Kim's book "Philosophy of Mind" lists about a dozen that he read in preparation for his PhD. However in a sense the conversation has progressed in a number of ways since 60s and 70s so I suspect that the aim here is to give some idea of at least a few issues that form the centre of contemporary discussions. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only CSCareerQuestions protests in solidarity with the developers who made third party reddit apps. However, one thing that this text had that I have not seen in other texts is that it tells it readers four There are tons of logic textbooks, and I don't think any of them were especially great or especially terrible. It's very clear and tightly argued. Please note that as of July 1 2023, given recent changes to reddit's platform which make moderation significantly more difficult, r/askphilosophy has moved to only allowing answers and follow-up questions by panelists. Van Inwagen's Essay on Free Will is still incredibly good. I'd say no, no, then yes. So, my last time teaching I used a mix of self-made handouts that I posted online and Lemmon's Basic Logic. Joshua May's Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Psychological Since you didn't specify your philosophical interests, what about the existentialist novel? In Spanish there are some good ones, like Sábato's El túnel or Unamuno's earlier San Manuel Bueno, mártir. Textbooks - Exchange, Reviews and Recommendations Also ebooks, audiobooks etc Tags: e-book, e-textbooks In philosophy there is a somewhat-recent field called "philosophy of engineering", which looks at knowledge in engineering in general. Meditations by Marcus Aurelius. It's been popping up increasingly at work and I'd love to find any resources that could give me a rundown over the course of a few weeks/month. However, there are quite a lot of books out there, and quite a lot of philosophers. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only Although Huff's book is really great and worth reading, there is something incredibly ironic I found out about him later on. You can still construct coherent and powerful arguments without the artillery presented in many modern textbooks on logic. Less Wrong has often Here are the best books on the history of philosophy in no particular order. I wanted to know if there were any good intro to sociology textbooks that explains the concepts of darwinism and such. Choosing philosophy just because you want to reason well is like buying a golden knobs horse chariot because you want to get to the bakery around the corner. It’s both. Philosophy has always interested me particularly when it comes to ethics. C. Amazon has the lowest priced textbooks 90% of the time. Only one I can't find is Philosophy, Politics, and Economics: An Anthology by Michael Munger, Jonathan Anomaly, Geoffrey Brennan, and Geoffrey Sayre-McCord. I like Sider and Feldman's Riddles of Existence a lot. 7. Besides Rovelli's philosophy in his 2020 book is not even good philosophy. These are very nice books for beginning. I’ve recently read The Problems of Philosophy and The Tyranny of Merit, enjoyed the latter more although found PoP quite enlightening at times as well. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit Best place to sell textbooks? I'm trying to sell a bunch of textbooks for my friend and I, and most of them are either not the current version (i. Vernon J. The History of Philosophy by Bertrand Russell is amazing. It's probably my favorite book on free will. In particular, Huff (says Gelman) was working Welcome to r/askphilosophy. I love this idea. Sorry for the late reply. I've been able to find some of them for free, but I'm having difficulty with others. Category: Pop-Nonfiction | Length: 272 pages. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only If you want to see something about meta-results I suggest Sider's Logic for philosophy. 5. The best place on Reddit for LSAT advice. I have three main options: "Modern Analog and Digital Communications" by Lathi and Zhi Ding The book by Haykin the book by Proakis & Salehi Which one do you recommend? Which one is the least dry, which one is the most indepth/updated? I would not start with things like Kant. There's not a lot written there yet about software engineering specifically. Language Truth & Logic by Alfred Jules Ayer . Hello guys, EE&CS student here. Please read our rules before commenting and understand that your comments will be removed if they are not up to standard or otherwise break the rules. Daoism and Confucianism are the two major historic schools of Chinese philosophy and both are clear influences in The Art of War. I do concede that these aren't philosophy majors, so they may not exactly fall into the aspiring philosopher category, but they were generally smart honors students at a good college. Posted by u/jennamsx - 9 votes and 5 comments Popper and Kuhn are indeed important figures in phil of science and essential reading if you're interested in the subject. ISBN: 978-0-19-020731-1 Any help would be much appreciated! There is a good deal of recent secondary scholarship on the Stoics, but it focuses very heavily on Stoic ethics, and to a lesser degree epistemology. I found it lacking in "form" and I would use it loosely because it seems to me that inductive arguments cover a broad clump of arguments. However, the following textbooks have served me well: (Comparative) Politics: Newton & Van Deth's Foundations of Comparative Politics Yeah, the book I taught myself logic from Logic: An Introduction by Robert Paul Churchill did a fantastic job at Categorical Logic and Symbolic logic, then it dropped off at Predicate Logic, but it did a terrible job at just identifying arguments that I had to skip to the Formal stuff. First day of grad school at the mandatory university-wide grad student orientation, some guy on the panel told us to go to the first two. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only I merely want to emphasize the possibility that you may already be predisposed to either one of these approaches. I'm not sure I've ever read a book that didn't come with some level of ontological commitment. Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy, 3rd edition, tr. We're a community created for psychiatrists and others in the mental health field to come together and discuss our field. If you would like to learn from the primary source materials, read the Daodejing / Tao Te Ching and the Analects [of Confucius] (the D. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only Dana Nelkin's Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Moral Luck. As I have become aware, in order to be in a position to appreciate the full force of his ideas, it is first necessary to have an understanding of the influences which shaped him; namely, ancient greek philosophy, and almost all subsequent western philosophy, with a particular focus on the overarching Welcome to r/askphilosophy! Please read our updated rules and guidelines before commenting. He also notes that Kim's book is the best introductory text out there for philosophy of mind. I'd also recommend Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics edited by Hawethorne, Sider, and Zimmerman. size, most textbooks are untreatable on smaller sizes. Depending on what kind of thinker and learner you are, you might do well to start with a textbook of some kind, but you want to be deeply engaging with the original papers and arguments themselves, in my opinion. He was hired by tobacco lobbyists (along with other well known statisticians like R. Lau translation and Roger Ames translation, respectively, are the ones we used in Chinese phil in college). Philosophy is everywhere in literature. ) OpenStax has their own version, although I don't think it has very good problems. ) with Pasnau's (ed. I would recommend: How To Do Things With Words by J. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only I asked a senior colleague of mine this question, and he recommended Rowe's Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction. ) for #4. r/sociology A chip A close button. They're doing nobody any good sitting unused in in your 73 votes, 129 comments. Obviously that's a bigger time-sink and prohibitively expensive for most but I believe that's the best way, especially for someone new to the subject, that can't be replicated by private study. " What are the best books on arguments for/against nihilism (the claim that life is meaningless) in contemporary analytic philosophy? Archived post. 2014. They don't sell. Eysenck & Keane and Gazzaniga et al. ) The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy (2 vols. Check out the website “The History of philosophy without any gaps” and the work of Alain de Botton. My city's libraries don't accept textbooks for their book sales. It is well written, though the structure of it feels redundant sometimes (he goes over an era chronologically then goes back and pulls out important things in major specific areas in a following section). If you wish to learn more, or to apply to become a panelist, Welcome to r/askphilosophy. Internet Archive is a good resource as well. L. Check out the sidebar for intro guides. So, my point is: where I've since discovered that textbooks are usually the quickest and best way to learn new material. Existentialism Is A Humanism, tr. Fisher) to fight back against the increasing epidemiological evidence coming out that showed how smoking is bad for people. But I have seen tertiary sources (textbooks or encyclopedias) in philosophy education quite rarely. It is more for a mathematical audience rather than a philosophical audience. I know it's a boring answer, but one of the problems is that no history of philosophy can be comprehensive unless you're just looking at a long list of philosophers, factual accounts about them, and stuff they've said - textbooks. A. That's what they are designed to be, after all. If there's anything we need LESS of, it's Agile. This sub is aimed at those at the beginner to intermediate level, generally in or around undergraduate studies. In my opinion, the best way to learn the most in the least amount of time is to physically acquire the book, disconnect from the internet, and read and re-read. You can work through slices of it like a textbook of course (there's exercises with a very wide range of difficulty), but they aren't really the sort of books designed for one to read with a clear thematic arc (unlike, say, SICP). It’s just a really good overview of cognitive biases and the practical negative effects they have on your life and society overall. Nobody wants them. 2013. Does r/Accounting have some suggestions on good textbooks for self-study? I don't need to be a CPA, but it would be helpful to have some foundational knowledge in the field. But like most things it’s going to be a little difficult getting started, philosophy has its quirks and there’re terms that might come up that you’ll want to google, if you don’t find it don’t worry about it just give your best interpretation, something Rousseau does is use terms without defining them. I will not claim that these are the best books in their categories, simply because of the fact that I have not read too much overlapping introductory textbooks (which would be rather redundant). Currie's Rock, Bone, and Ruin. For example it’s easy to take an intro quantum mechanics class and get the impression that quantum mechanics is about solving differential equations, or even a particular differential equation. His collection of essays Thinking about Free Will is also good, and it has some real gems, like the essay on how to think about the problem of free will. 3. That field is different from philosophy in "Science and Technology Studies" (STS) which tends to be more sociological. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only Philosophy is what I’d study if I’d be inheriting a few millions of dollars. I assume you mean apart from the obvious classics like Plato’s Republic, Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Book III of Hume’s Treatise of Human Nature, Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Nietzsche’s The Genealogy of Morals and Mill’s Welcome to r/askphilosophy. Post your Philosophy-related memes here, not there. A good friend of mine is really into philosophy, but I have never taken a course or read a philosophy book or anything. ) The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity (2 vols. I can search for used textbooks, but there are a lot of them, and even used ones can be pricey. 4. Sure, the two most popular resources on these topics are Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design (a junior year textbook in the typical ME program) and Machinerys Handbook (not an academic reference, but more a catch-all reference for many concepts, lookup tables, and useful working information on the job). David Chalmers’s collection Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings has a comprehensive set of readings that can help you get oriented in what’s been going on for the last several decades (and I think it also has stuff from Descartes, Brentano, etc. You'd be wise to stay away from the newer ones. Metaphysics: Sosa & Kim - Metaphysics. Sven Bernecker and Duncan Pritchard's Routledge Companion to Epistemology is a good handbook, given how much it covers and the depth with which each topic is treated. First 2 meditations are relevant. Even more readable dead white old guy stuff like Hume can be really daunting when you're just starting to look at philosophy. Post any questions you have, there are lots of Anthony Kenny's "A New History of Western Philosophy" is a one stop shop that'll get you the basic gist of what's going on in philosophy. It seems to me that one person's opinion is insufficient data to conclude that a textbook is the best available on the subject. rodrx iabow qag igkwh som pmcju scyi qaots cktmk popx