Fortigate view incoming traffic reddit The issue is the traffic stops suddenly when the SSLVPN is connected you just cant ping or RDP anything, but the connection stills up. This is possible. The only traffic I have is the above traffic. Check the various policies and drill-down to sessions as needed or filter by source/dest. Their WAN connection is 500 Mbps and the average consumption is around 100 Mbps. Administration has asked me to block all countries except for the USA. I'm willing to bet nobody supports this. Web filter for outbound Internet traffic. You will need to create a dummy interface to temporarily assign to the policies where you have WAN1 and WAN2 as a source or destination interface. You will need to set the public IP as the source-ip in CLI of various features. Both interfaces are in a zone and policies are applied to the zone. "direction" in the IPS logs will signal the attack direction from point of view of the session-initiator (you connect to a server and attack it = outgoing; you connect to a server and it attacks you = incoming) Just a quick one - I have a FortiGate 500e and a Firewalla Gold here and am looking to use the Firewalla to control some internet traffic. Solution: IPsec Monitor: In the firmware version 6. Use whireshark on both endpoints to see if a ping is transmitted and received by the workstation/server. 4 and in DNS resolution since 6. But the Fortigate isn’t abiding by that logic. Hey guys. The lookup command will tell you if the policy you created gets matched for the given input - if a different policy is found (e. I saw a feature in fortigate that can allow one policy to have a multiple incoming or outgoing interface. The guidance I've seen in FortiGate manual says interface in, WAN1, interface out, WAN2 and so here I am reaching out for opinions. I have setup a rule to block RDP traffic from internal (Internal interface) to Wan1 ((Outgoing interface). 459980 <office external ip> <VM IP> Syslog 1337 LOCAL7. When I configured the firewall rules, there are some security profiles that can apply to the firewall rules. The problem I've got is traffic coming in on WAN2 is trying to go out of WAN1 - the default gateway. I put phase 2 selectors address to quad 0 on both side (Fortigate and strongswan). On the second Fortigate (40F/6. Node" objects is the best way to do that and they don't include the ENTIRE list of IPs I can accept that. If in the rule with ALL services you have Log all traffic/sessions , you can right click the rule and select Show Matching logs. Have you ever seen anything like this? When traffic is initiated the other direction, from 101F to the VM, it goes through a port on the 101F assigned to the Zone that is set in the policies for the VPN tunnel. I believe the issue is on my side but I need more from the firewall. Printers are connected static to secure wifi. I think that you can block the access from that particular source using local-in policy. 124&#39; and o For INCOMING traffic, it works great. We needed additional public IPs so we’ve ordered 2 more and our ISP gave us 2 new PPPoE connections for these new IPs. Out of 25 firewalls, only gives me this behavior. I have a policy that denies incoming traffic from certain IPs and a couple countries. So if I understand correctly using a AV/IPS UTM profile is probably only marginally useful as encrypted communications probably prevent most of the important intelligence AV/IPS functionality can do. By default enabling NAT in a firewall policy it will perform Source NAT with the primary IP address of the existing interface. Use the various FortiView options, set to the “now” timeframe. If inbound traffic comes in WAN1 the firewall will forward all outbound packets associated with that session over WAN1. This will cause an internet outage for users behind the FortiGate. I’ve done this during a maintenance window in 1 hour. internet access is working and the external IP appears correct on whatsmyip etc. Without it, the Fortigate will route to the gateway of last resort when the vpn goes down and keep sessions there after the vpn comes back up. Incoming Interface: wan1 Outgoing Interface: (Any?) Source: Threat Feed Destination: None Schedule: Always Service: ALL Action: DENY Worried that I'll brick my 40F if this rule is made wrong. Scope Solution How to understand request and reply traffic incoming and outgoing interfaces. The VPN is UP on both firewalls. All SIP traffic goes out on the fiber. This is useful when you want to confirm that packets are using the route you expect them to take on your network. ( you can block external hosts/Geo hosts etc from trying to initiate routing protocols, IPSec, PING etc whereas thi Hi everyone ! We have a fortigate 50E in our company without any license. Hi everyone ! We have a fortigate 50E in our company without any license. 0/0 on the IPSEC and use routing/rules for traffic. 6 FortiOS and had to separate Teams traffic into a separate policy with no security profiles and instead of ISDB I’ve whitelisted about 40 IPs recommend to be whitelisted by Microsoft for Teams traffic. I have 11 fortigates ranging from 100E to 300E with 6. com&#39; website will be reached, which will be resolved to &#39;92. 7 and running into issues no matter how/where I apply the policy it doesn't limited traffic. I’ve got a case open with support. That is the core reason why the traffic cannot be offloaded - because traffic passing through a soft-switch must go through the kernel. FortiGate). Im using a policy route to send all traffic from one server out a particular wan (say wan2) interface and it is working fine from the servers point of view - i. Right but the Fortigate’s evaluation of the chain should match that as a modern browser like Chrome. Port 2 and Port 3 from fortiMAIL are connected to Port 17 and Port 18 fortiGATE with private IP. i need your help guys how i can configure it that the traffic will forward to the client from the secondary line after response of the web server. Bypass DoS for Microsoft Teams' traffic -- We don't have any policies under IPv4 DoS Policy Use the threshold of UDP packets on DDOS policy -- Again, we don't have a DoS policy in Fortigate Don't use teams on split-tunnel VPN -- The issue occurs without VPN Microsoft Teams has also had issues when used with proxy and UTM features. if your DNS server is somewhere on the I like to have a NetMgmt subnet with the management interfaces of all the network equipment behind it. Hello there. I have fortigate 60d and I configured IPsec tunnel but it is not passing the traffic through my TPlink archer c80 router. 220. For your local traffic you would go lan -> wan since the clients are physically on the "lan" side of the firewall. The only way to ensure the traffic is fully offloaded is to encapsulate it into VXLAN outside of the FortiGate. e. Our standard procedure is to create interfaces with matching address objects, the policies will have incoming interface selected, the address object for that interface is used as source. When starting a ping from the hub to the spoke I start seeing incoming ESP packets on the spoke. me returns VPN IP when all traffic route is in place. My goal is to limit specific LAN facing interfaces. What are you needing that you’re not seeing? View in log and report > forward traffic. I have an IPSEC VPN that is UP , one of the Phase 2 selectors is down , but I can see traffic coming through that VPN on the IP addresses that are configured on the phase 2 that is down. Is there any way to have this traffic logged instead of monitoring the NIC? Is there no log for incoming traffic to a server that communicates publicly? Firewalls are stateful devices, meaning they track the state (source IP, dest IP, sourt port, dest port, etc), and automatically allow the return traffic back in. One works, one doesn't. Bare in mind I want to eventually run full deep packet inspection and security profiles etc. Well, attackers from outside US can use a VPN to show their IP as in the US, thus bypassing the Geo-object IP filtering. No matter how you juggle around any additional encapsulation you cannot change that. If you have connected the clients through a L2 device (switch), and no VLANs are defined, AND the interface IP of the FortiGate is the default gateway for the clients, you should be good to go. You want a policy on 25 FTGs that blocks incoming traffic from yyy. &#39;firewallgeeks. Feb 13, 2022 · how to check the actual incoming and outgoing interfaces based on index values in session output. I'm having no issues with traffic in general, it's just not what I expect to see on the inbound initiated traffic. For incoming/outgoing interface I have the fiber WAN interface set for both, since I want to specify SIP traffic both inbound and outbound. Anyone experience trouble with VNC traffic on the FortiGate 80F? My 80F logs show the incoming traffic, but the traffic isn’t allowed or denied. It’ll show you what’s moving through the firewall. I am assuming this covers both directions? I did the report and noticed that there were more than 6gb "sent" in the incoming connection, obviously that's not normal for SMTP. System Events: I can see data when it provides DHCP statistics, fails to join FortiCloud and for the times when an Auth succeeded OR failed. what if I want the same NAT to happen, for outbound?The above gives an example of setting up a firewall policy for inbound. E. The fortimail management port (port 1 – public IP) is connected to a switch which is connected to the spine so we can connect to the fortimail from home. 44. Traffic tracing allows you to follow a specific packet stream. DNS filter anywhere dns is allowed. Is it advisable to use it? for example. NOTICE: Dec 04 20:04:56 FortiGate-80F CEF:0|Fortinet|Fortigate|v7. 4 and onwards. 9|00013|traffic:forward close|3|deviceExternalId=>our fw serial number> FTNTFGTeventtime=1670180696638926545 FTNTFGTtz=+0100 Hello guys, I have a question regarding incoming traffic going through ipsec VPN. 0. A 30Gbps DDoS isn’t going to be helped by putting a FortiDDoS on a 1Gbps or 10Gbps link going into a FortiGate 1800F it’s your incoming line that gets saturated before the FortiGate. If no matches are found, then the FortiGate does a route lookup using the routing table. This works well but also all traffic is being routed. When i sniff the packet thru the fortigate i saw there is a reply coming, but the wireshark in the users PC dont see any response. We have an up-link which uses a PPPoE connection. I am new to Fortigate. Or more precisely: it doesn't get to the USG-3P I see it leaving the FGT60E with a trace, but the same traffic cannot be sniffed on the USG-3P as incoming traffic. Trying to get traffic shaping working on 6. What are we missing? In nearly all FortiGate facilities we can leverage dynamic external block lists and other native Fortinet/FortiGuard protections in policies since 6. EAP can be complex, I don't think reddit is the right place to get it fixed. SSL inspection without any UTM profile to use it is pretty much completely useless/pointless. 2. Looking on the hub I see no incoming or outgoing ESP packets. Can s Anyone experience trouble with VNC traffic on the FortiGate 80F? My 80F logs show the incoming traffic, but the traffic isn’t allowed or denied. 249. The IP is given an address object name of AO-BLACKLIST-1 (we're assuming that this is not a dynamic object in FMG(look up what that is)). I have already tried to develop a web application that filters the log files but it is tedious and the logs contain data that is a bit useless for my purpose. The incoming interface in that policy should look like “SSL-VPN tunnel interface (ssl root)” but I don’t think I ever created it manually. I usually set source ip for FGT services to this to make it predictable. I guess I'm just looking for the best practice to block Outbound -> Inbound Tor traffic, If making a deny rule with both the "Tor-Exit. On the spoke I see a constant flow of outgoing but no incoming ESP packets, I presume these outgoing packets are from the SD-WAN performance SLA checks. On the first Fortigate (100D/6. Similarly for destination, setting all may allow traffic to take a route you wouldn't want, which is where a more explicit selection comes in handy. AV/IPS functionality can probably do some basic heuristic based pattern identification, but We have two WAN circuits (primary/fiber and backup/coax). Here are my best practices:--For my general IP Signatures(internet users): CRITICAL and HIGH severity signatures = Set to BLOCK MEDIUM (and optional:LOW) = Set to DEFAULT The palo does send traffic but the fortigate receives nothing at all, even when sniffing the traffic So a debug flow shows no incoming traffic? If the tunnel is actually up, and everything on the Palo Alto and FortiGate is configured correctly (mainly phase 2 and routes) you should at the very least see the enc stat increase in diagnose vpn Under the SSLVPN Firewall Policy itself: I have a policy log and I can see the traffic that exists once an SSLVPN connection is established and passes traffic however that's about it. In the forward traffic section, we can check outbound traffic but I could not filter on inbound. 4. I want incoming traffic on WAN2 to go out of WAN2. The strange thing is that I do not see that pi's IP anywhere in the fortigate logs. 3) I can ping behind it and it shows me traffic flowing into the tunnel as allowed by policy. My question is, does this block both incoming and outgoing traffic? It is confusing to me that there is an incoming and outgoing interface. Get rid of your existing geo-blocking rule or empty it, then replace its settings so that it contains the country/countries you want to ALLOW, then add an address entry for this remote VPN user to that same Source field. " Are you sure your incoming traffic matches specifically enough for your policy to route the traffic properly? However, I couldn't get it to work. I would have thought, Antivirus feature would be applied to the incoming traffic, but if the only policy is the one that goes outside, what am I missing? Also it appears traffic from the Vendor Cloud is coming in to your FortiGate on Interface with IP 1. I would like to route all the internet traffic from my VPC network (10. Check the logs if you want to know For now, I have set the source IPs to Geo-object which filters out some incoming traffic. Thank you guys a lot (: Hey guys, Noob question here. Do cert + EAP instead. curl ifconfig. I'm on the IPv4 Policy page, creating a new policy. Restarting the ipsec tunnel or rebooting the Fortigate fixes this until the next outage. Well there's no way to really confirm its being blocked if nothing tries it. My fear is if traffic leaves on one interface x1 and comes back in on the other interface x2 it will be denied due to asymmetric routing since I have seen that before with 2 paths like this. Disable HW offload in the policy if you want to see all packets of the traffic session in sniffer: config firewall policy edit <policy-id> set auto-asic-offload disable end In Fortigate you can enable SNAT directly in a firewall policy. The VPN is showing as UP on both sides, but no traffic seems to be arriving at the FGT. I understand these are example IPs but those appear to be same subnet. Flow based AV on low security policies, proxy AV for high security, separate IPS profiles for ingress/egress, etc. Please see attachment. If you want a different Source NAT IP you can create IP Pools. 0 will bypassed by default. I've tried capturing traffic to the real IP from the VPN IP but I can't see it. We want to record and view the websites visited by the employees. Having an issue with incoming traffic on an FG60F Two separate ISPs wan1 with public address wan2 with private 192. Are UTM profiles applied to the outgoing traffic or to the incoming one? Let me elaborate on this: If I am not mistaken there are two main policies, implicit deny and LAN to WAN traffic. There should be 2 rules for each VPN on each Firewall. 0/20) through my IPSec site-to-site VPN tunnel. Allot) and the other uses traffic control aka retransmission requests/retries/window control (eg. During these changes we wanted to check external traffic coming into our firewall. Running a couple VLANs which would be terminating at the Fortigate as well. 2 and going out an interface with IP 1. It's getting off-loaded (good thing!), and offloaded traffic doesn't show up in the sniffer (it doesn't hit the kernel). We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. . I would put down either a 100E/F model. assuming i have mutiple vlan under fortigate Lan to > Vlan 1, vlan 2, rather than lan > vlan 1 lan > vlan 2 Thank you for the advise Not sure how much it's logging on incoming traffic have to check the policies. protect_client IPS on all outbound rules AV/WF and/or DF/AF/DPI on any outbound web-based rules AV/AS on any outbound email-based rules VPC -- Fortigate . As for your config. The FortiGate typically is the gateway of this subnet and filters incoming traffic to the trusted source subnets. FortiGate doesn't use firewall policies for its own traffic, so those policies with IP pools won't do anything. diagnose sys The fortigate uses 2 static routes, 1 to route all LAN traffic with a specific destination subnet to another datacenter stack that is directly connected to the fortigate (no subnet overlaps). Also, the rule with ALL will take precedence over any more granular ones, so you would need to move those above this rule. FortiGate SSL VPN securing and blocking malicious inbound traffic and authentication attempts. So if you are running through other routers, the FortiGate needs the routing information. So far, the tunnels are UP on both Fortigates but traffic is not flowing through. If WAN1 were to fail the outbound traffic will definitely reach the outside using the WAN2, but the incoming traffic destined to WAN1 public IPs won't reach my network, at least I use let's say BGP. (consider a TAC ticket) At a glance, you definitely don't want PSK + EAP. I was wondering the best way to route traffic through the Firewalla and out to the WAN? The topology is like so: Incoming -> FortiGate -> Meraki Core Switches -> mix of NetGear/Cisco Access Switches. (FortiGate authenticates itself with a certificate, the client will authenticate by successfully passing EAP) All traffic is matched to sessions. Have you ever seen anything like this? FortiGate will continue down the policy route list until it reaches the end. The easiest thing to do is what I did for this exact scenario. Security profiles on literally everything. You would see traffic coming in in the sniffer but not being forwarded. But when i try to do the same thing for outbound. There might also be traffic onto your WAN interface (sslvpn if enabled for example). 2, it is necessary to go to Monitor -> IPsec Monitor to view the incoming and outgoing data via GUI as shown in the screenshot below. If both are fortigate use 0. Not further policies are needed aside from the inbound rule tied to the Virtual IP. Not all traffic has to go from WAN to LAN. App control enabled and, at minimum set to monitor all, block malicious. I see on the log that the traffic reach the Web server, but the traffic is not going back to the client i think because the primary line (AD-10). Have some of you find the correct way to block access to Hotmail/Outlook personal webmail but leave the Office365 access open ? I've tried webfiltering and application control, but hotmail/outlook seems to be wrongly detected as an office365 website/application. We recently made some changes to our incoming webmail traffic. I've got a test firewall in a lab with two WAN connections. Here's a scenario. node" and "Tor-Relay. 6) no traffic is incoming. They recommended calling the ISP? That is garbage. You would also need to log to memory or disk to view them locally on the device. My policy allows anything from that vlan to go outside. You would only need a WAN->LAN policy if you're trying to allow traffic initiated from the internet into your network. Performing a traffic trace. The other is the default route and routes all traffic to the gateway of the WAN subnet. It's one of their higher end models 1200D but they definitely try to push you to do the logging with fortianalyzer on different hardware. It would have to be a service from your ISP to stop it. yyy. Thx, found it while waiting for your answer :-) The firewall is sending logs indeed: 116 41. Another thing to consider is that SSL-VPN is using port 443 and management access, if its enabled on wan interface is also listening on 443. Dec 29, 2024 · The article describes how to view incoming and outgoing data of IPsec VPN from GUI. On the PA side, it shows that traffic is leaving without any detected blockages. Essentially, the tunnel is unusable since return traffic for DNS and pings from the remote site get responded to but the response never arrives at the USG-3P. I have cloud logging enabled and see logs for every device except the pi. I'm doing it as follows, I created a new zone, "SD-VPN" I made Firewall rules releasing traffic, and I created an SDWAN rule, origin "any" destined for Site B's network, but Fortigate, seems to ignore this rule . So, the question: is the traffic flow (sent/received) from the policy point of view (let's say I'm sending the mail to the VIP in the destination) or from the interface point of view (the I'm receiving an email View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit Fortigate filter URL inbound Hy, can someoane tell me if Fortigate supports filtering by URL, inbound. ECMP is configured so the fortigate installed 2x each route in the table. Permanently fix it by verifying there is a blackhole route for the ipsec remote subnets. I'll look into those thanks for the suggestions they've been very helpful. Do you think which one is suitable for incoming and outgoing traffic? I list down the profile I usually work on here: AV profile IPS profile Web Filtering profile DNS filtering profile WAF profile File filtering profile I'm new to Fortinet so this may be a dumb question. Dropped packets is expected (per u/pabechan) in traffic control systems so seeing dropped packets is not important (unless is exceeds a significant % of the total traffic in which case, you TS rules may not be optimal). it wont let me set the Virtual IP set for the "src" ip addrs. Ok, that makes sense I can definitely understand that. It will still use its "WAN IP" to talk to the internet, which as expected from your description, won't work. if your DNS server is somewhere on the This works well but also all traffic is being routed. So, I have a problem working with 3 PPPoE connections on a forti 60E. I am reading in the release notes that as of 6. Logs enabled for every policy by default Traffic from/to border and spine are going to the fortigate for filtering as classic firewall. Policies need to be created in the direction you want traffic to flow. 168. Like, I can't confirm that the traffic is actually making it through the firewall. you've got another policy higher up that overrides your Deny policy) it'll show you what policy actually matched. As everyone is on the same layer 2 domain the traffic will never proxy the firewall so your policy is useless Best the either move the PC into another VLAN and then use policies or just use Windows Firewall to block the traffic for everyone except the mac mini. 0 I think. Do I just add the other 190 something countries to this policy? Or is there a better way to do this? I have an implicit deny at the bottom of the policies fwiw. However, on the FGT side, there is no incoming traffic. SD WAN logic in fortigate is kinda only for outbound traffic, when it comes to incoming traffic it's more like a static routes. g. Could the fortigate have blocked jackett's traffic automatically? I can't find anywhere that says it found/blocked any threats so far. Here are some details about the deployment: Traffic is unidirectional : from PA to FGT. Scope: FortiGate v6. Going to depend on the DDoS style, and your FortiGate and line capabilities. What exactly should be there? Attaching both screenshots. Audio traffic port range: 50,000–50,019 (TCP/UDP) Video traffic port range: 50,020–50,039 (TCP/UDP) Application Sharing port range: 50,040–50,059 (TCP/UDP) Also, I can see that the WAN utilization on the Fortigate is around 20% of their bandwidth. You can use the 'diagnose sniffer packet' command in the cli to view traffic going to the server in question. Long story short, local-in policy refers to direct opened ports/services on the interfaces, rather than an object/VIP which you can block/allow with firewall policy. VPN clients connect in via the internet (usually) so you need to set the incoming interface to whichever one is going out to the internet. Also double check the rules on the fortigate. The same section offers to route specific traffic but I’m a little baffled with options naming scheme for the “IP address category” and “On device”. The configs are identical. When switching to static route, everything works normally. It’s technically OK that an expired CA is included in the chain as long as it is cross signed by a valid one. Then, because the option doesn’t exist in the GUI on newer versions of FortiOS, go into the CLI and edit The palo does send traffic but the fortigate receives nothing at all, even when sniffing the traffic So a debug flow shows no incoming traffic? If the tunnel is actually up, and everything on the Palo Alto and FortiGate is configured correctly (mainly phase 2 and routes) you should at the very least see the enc stat increase in diagnose vpn Under the SSLVPN Firewall Policy itself: I have a policy log and I can see the traffic that exists once an SSLVPN connection is established and passes traffic however that's about it. On the fortigate side i added this policy : Brief layout Fortigate 60F -> FS 224FPOE -> (3x) FAP 231F I am trying to setup our 3 HP pagewide MFD with scan to email, (Office 365) and traffic keeps getting dropped even after testing with every policy I can think of. In general, I do the following: . 240/24 address Two internal… FortiGate will continue down the policy route list until it reaches the end. I've got the routing setup so that one is primary and the other secondary - that works perfectly. To view traffic sessions: Use this command to view the characteristics of a traffic session though specific security policies. Reddit's community for Amazfit products - • Bip OG Also, the FortiGate needs to have a correct view of the topology. 3, that SSL Traffic over TLS 1. 1. But. kxvwfu iadzj mpljjgw membk sma amyykykb ctowkqlj adezrc xrcp ozs qno ncubrjkt yqyg yzu yavpb